DSpark declares no sliding window, so its draft context -- built with
n_ctx = llama_n_ctx(ctx_tgt) -- caches the whole target window: 5 layers x 2 x 8
kv heads x 128 dim x 2 B = 20 KiB/position, i.e. 5.0 GiB at 262144, where
DFlash2's sliding_window 2048 cost ~40 MiB. At a 1:1 split that put ROCm1 at
33.9 GB of 34.2 GB and the first draft graph capture died inside
common_speculative_impl_draft_dflash::process with "ROCm error: out of memory"
-- after the model had loaded and /health had answered, which is why the deploy
looked like a crash-loop rather than a sizing failure.
Handing three target layers to ROCm0 restores headroom on both cards at the full
window. Measured at 262144: 28.52 GB / 30.71 GB, i.e. 5.30 GiB and 3.26 GiB free
(was 2.7 GB free on the draft-carrying card with 1:1 + DFlash2). The unit seam
now models the busier card as a skewed share plus the drafter's full-context KV,
calibrated to the rocm-smi figure.
AGENTS.md gains the durable lesson: read sliding_window out of the drafter's
GGUF header before sizing a spec-decode deployment.
Frank
b6d4914fcc