--- type: runbook title: frank-primary — GLM-5.3-Flash W4A16 int4 (tcclaviger, 2x R9700) description: VERIFIED 2026-09-30 by boot probe, bench, live expert-cache telemetry AND a torch-profiler kernel-time window. frank-primary cut over from Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Uncensored-FP8 + MTP4 to Intel/GLM-5.3-Flash-W4A16-AutoRound, the first payload this fleet serves through the fork's W4A16 expert-offload path (INC scheme -> R4dW4a16MoEMethod, libr4d grouped W4A16 GEMM). Measured decode 9.9-10.0 tok/s and prefill 918 tok/s at 131,072 ctx. THE 35 tok/s TARGET IS NOT MET, and the profiler window FALSIFIED the first explanation: the expert gather is 1.05 % of device time, not the bound. 44 % of the 93 ms/token budget is pointwise glue (1,428 elementwise launches per token) because the fork's GLM trunk is NOT torch.compiled while its own Qwen trunk is; the second-largest lever, the fused router, is binary-blocked at 288 experts. The compile changelist is staged but incomplete (three patches, one blocker left). tags: - dankserver - r9700 - gfx1201 - glm5.3 - w4a16 - int4 - expert-offload - expert-cache - autoround - vllm timestamp: 2026-09-30 --- # frank-primary — GLM-5.3-Flash W4A16 int4 (tcclaviger, 2x R9700) > **Question this page answers.** Can the fleet serve the 320B-class > `GLM-5.3-Flash` at int4 on two R9700s with expert offload, and how fast is it? > **Answer.** Yes — it serves, with vision, tool calls and 131,072 ctx. It runs > at **9.9-10.0 tok/s decode / 918 tok/s prefill**, and **35 tok/s is not > reachable** on this payload as the fork ships it. The bound is **not** the > model, the quant, the link, or the expert gather (measured: 1.05 % of device > time). It is the **unfused pointwise glue of an uncompiled trunk** — 44 % of a > 93 ms per-token budget spread over ~1,428 elementwise launches per token — > because the fork compiles its own Qwen trunk and not its GLM one. See > [The measured profile](#the-measured-profile-and-the-real-wall). Related: [[dankserver-qwen38-fp8-expert-offload-tuning]] (the same fork, the same hardware — its conclusion was drawn from throughput arithmetic and is superseded by this page's kernel-time measurement), [[dankserver-frontier-moe-feasibility]] (the earlier fit analysis), [[VLLM Index]], [[LLM/index|LLM fleet]]. ## The deployed shape | term | value | | --- | --- | | payload | `Intel/GLM-5.3-Flash-W4A16-AutoRound` — AutoRound **symmetric int4, group 128**, packing `auto_round:auto_gptq`, 34 shards + 2 extra safetensors, 113,074 tensors, ~170 GiB | | runtime | `docker.io/tcclaviger/vllm@sha256:da4029666…` (same digest-pinned image as the qwen cutover) | | engine | TP=2, `--enable-expert-offload --expert-precise-memory`, max-model-len 131,072 x 2 seqs, bf16 KV, util 0.98, NBATCH 2048, prefix caching | | MoE kernel | `R4dW4a16MoEMethod` → libr4d grouped W4A16 GEMM, 6.234 MiB per expert-rank slot | | expert cache | 14.51 GiB = **2,383 slots** per rank; 12,096 host-backed experts, **73.64 GiB pinned per rank** | | unit | `scripts/frank-primary.service` (root unit, `LimitMEMLOCK=infinity` for the pin) | | measured | **decode 9.9-10.0 tok/s**, **prefill 918 tok/s** (warm, 2.6k-token prompt), KV cache 138,561 tokens | ```mermaid graph LR A[Intel AutoRound W4A16
sym int4 g128, auto_gptq] -->|quant_method auto-round| B[inc.py override to inc] B --> C[inc_wna16_scheme
_resolve_gptq_moe] C -->|sym int4 g128 + gfx1201 + libr4d| D[R4dW4a16MoEMethod
grouped W4A16 GEMM] D --> E[ExpertLRUCache
2,383 VRAM slots / rank] D --> F[73.64 GiB pinned host rows / rank] E --> G[decode step] F -->|host misses
1.05% of device time| G ``` ## Why this payload and not another The W4A16 fast path on this fork is reachable **only** through the INC (AutoRound) quant method. `compressed_tensors` checkpoints of the same model — for example `dealignai/GLM-5.3-Flash-CYBERSECURITY-W4A16`, 182 GiB — resolve their MoE through the WNA16 oracle to `TritonWNA16Experts`, which **has no offload recipe**, and the engine refuses to serve at all: 170 GiB of experts cannot fit 64 GiB of VRAM, so offload is mandatory, not optional. The chain that makes Intel's checkpoint work, with the exact evidence: ``` [expert_plan.py] quantization=inc ← inc.py:364 overrides "auto-round" [inc_wna16_scheme.py:249] INC GPTQ MoE on ROCm: R4dW4a16MoEExperts (libr4d grouped W4A16 GEMM) [r4d_w4a16_moe.py:682] Using MoEPrepareAndFinalizeNoDPEPModular / R4dW4a16MoEExperts [expert.py:450] Expert offload: 42 MoE layers staged; 2,383 cache slots in 14.51 GiB planned per rank [expert.py:413] 42 layers split: 0 VRAM-only experts, 2,383 swap slots, arena 14.51 GiB, host 73.64 GiB pinned, host rows prepacked on the GPU ``` `R4dW4a16MoEExperts` is what the offload machinery wraps: the offload plan is format-agnostic but requires the experts class to expose the hot/cold split. ## The numbers, and the wall Measured on the deployed engine, 2026-09-30 (`bench_glm.py`, real prose, greedy): | depth | prefill | decode | | --- | --- | --- | | 2,621 tok prompt, run 1 (cold cache) | 259 tok/s | 9.88 | | 2,621 tok prompt, runs 2-3 (warm) | 918 / 885 tok/s | 9.91 / 9.41 | | 493 tok prompt (telemetry window) | 124 tok/s | 8.90 | Decode is flat across context and across every arena change — the signature of a per-step cost that is not KV- or residency-driven at the margin. ### The measured profile, and the real wall **This section replaces an earlier explanation, which the measurement falsified.** The first reading of this page bounded the step with throughput arithmetic: 42 MoE layers x 8 experts x 6.234 MiB = 2.045 GiB per step per rank, 0.82 GiB of it missed at a measured 0.53-0.66 hit rate, giving "0.82 GiB in ~100 ms = 8.2 GB/s = the gather is the wall". That arithmetic was circular — it *assumed* the gather consumed the whole step — and it is wrong. The engine, asked directly, disagrees: A torch-profiler window (`--profiler-config`, `POST /start_profile` / `stop_profile`, 496 decode tokens at the deployed shape, rank0 trace parsed for device-activity time) gives the true split. Total device kernel time **46.18 s / 496 tokens = ~93 ms per token** against a measured ~104 ms step (9.6 tok/s with the profiler attached): | ms | % | launches | kernel | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 16,074 | **34.8** | 708,500 | `vectorized_elementwise_kernel` (22.7 us each) | | 4,602 | 10.0 | 42,000 | `r4d_gemm_moe_w4a16_nt_b16_m64` — the MoE GEMM | | 3,108 | 6.7 | 174,708 | `elementwise_kernel_manual_unroll` | | 2,943 | 6.4 | 138,252 | `wvSplitK_hf_sml_` — split-K GEMM (projections / head) | | 2,829 | 6.1 | 83,160 | router: `sbtopk::gatherTopK` + `warpMergeSortTopK` + `bitonicSortKVInPlace` (1,208 + 1,051 + 559 ms; the 1,051 row is not in the list below) | | 3,015 | 6.5 | 133,920 | `r4d_mhc_pre_finish/pre_partial/post` — hyper-connections | | 2,782 | 6.0 | 127,916 | inductor `triton_poi_*` / `triton_per_*` (the fusions that DO happen) | | **487** | **1.05** | 20,664 | **`r4d_moe_lru_gather_kernel`** — the accused | | 250 | 0.54 | 20,832 | `_moe_lru_tele_kernel` — the telemetry that measured it (TELEM was on) | So the gather is **1.05 %** of device time, and `r4d_moe_lru_fused_kernel` (the LRU *manager*, not the copy) is a further 1,599 ms / 3.5 %. Residency work and the PCIe link are not the story: 44 % of the budget is **pointwise glue** — bf16<->fp32 conversions, adds, `pow`/`rsqrt` from fp32 RMSNorm, `launch_clamp_scale` quant passes, `reduce_kernel` means — spread over **~1,428 elementwise launches per token** (3,734 kernel launches per token in total). The GPU is busy 86 % of the wall clock, so this is real device work, not launch-gap overhead. Two consequences that kill three whole families of planned work: - **Spec decode cannot help this shape, and the MTP measurement was not an accident.** Pointwise cost scales with the token count, so a draft batch that verifies 4 tokens pays ~4x the glue for the same per-token output — which is exactly why MTP4 measured "acceptance 3.76-4.90, decode unchanged". Same reason the gather was never the bound. - **Arena size and hit rate are not levers.** Confirmed twice: `--expert-precise-memory` (arena 13.08 -> 14.51 GiB) moved decode by nothing, and the gather is 1 %. ## Fork work: the compile changelist (WIP, does not boot yet) The fork compiles its own flagship trunk — `vllm/models/qwen4_exp/amd/model.py` carries `@support_torch_compile` — and **not** its GLM trunk. The engine says so on every boot: ``` Cudagraph mode FULL_AND_PIECEWISE requires piecewise capture, but the loaded model provides neither a compiled submodule nor breakable CUDA graphs. Overriding to FULL_DECODE_ONLY. ``` Inductor fusion is therefore the only lever that touches the 44 % pointwise mass. Three patches are staged in `scripts/patches/glm53-compile-0*.patch`, each carrying its own evidence header, base/patched sha256 and the next blocker: | patch | target | fixes | | --- | --- | --- | | `-01-model-decorator` | `models/glm5next/common/model.py` | decorates `Glm5NextModel` (env `R4D_GLM_COMPILE`, default on) | | `-02-trace-safe-probes` | `model_executor/kernels/r4d_lib.py` | freezes 10 capability probes that do `os.path.exists`/`.so` lookups **inside the traced forward** | | `-03-fullgraph-optout` | `compilation/wrapper.py` | makes `fullgraph=True` opt-out (env `VLLM_COMPILE_FULLGRAPH=0`) | What the boots established, in order (each one ~7 min): 1. **01 alone dies** on the first cold probe call inside the traced region: `Dynamo does not know how to trace the builtin 'posix.stat'` — `r4d_mhc_supported -> r4d_lib.r4d_mhc_enabled -> available -> os.path.exists`. **`functools.lru_cache` does not protect these probes**: dynamo re-traces the wrapped body to build its guard even when the cache is warm (it warns about exactly this), verified in-image — a *warm* lru_cache-calling function still fails `fullgraph=True`, while a plain module-global read compiles. 2. **01+02 get past it** (`libr4d capability probes frozen: 10 warm [...]` in all four processes) and die on `RuntimeError: Graph breaks are not supported with aot compile`, because this build runs AOT compile by default and AOT refuses breaks. 3. **01+02+03 with `VLLM_COMPILE_FULLGRAPH=0 VLLM_USE_AOT_COMPILE=0` traces the trunk successfully** (`Dynamo bytecode transform time: 1.08 s`) and then dies on the decode forward with `KeyError: 'in_proj_qkvbfg_a'` (`Glm5NextModel.forward` line 748 calling the decoder layer at line 456). `in_proj_qkvbfg_a` is the KDA layer's merged column-parallel projection (`kda.py:217`, called at :407) — a real submodule attribute name, also present in the `load_weights` shard table (`model.py:780-785`). Reading the full traceback (the reported line is inside dynamo-rewritten code) traces the throw to dynamo's own name→module map: `torch/_dynamo/output_graph.py` registers into `nn_modules` at :1259/:1384, looks up with `self.nn_modules[node.target]` at :3000 (a bare-name `KeyError` when absent), and documents stripping `_buffers[..]/_parameters[..]/_modules[..]` from those names at :1225. So the compiler is failing to **resolve a submodule by name** while tracing the GLM decoder layer; whether the root cause is the fork's module tree or dynamo's registration is not yet settled. The next step is the one torch itself suggests in that error — `TORCHDYNAMO_VERBOSE=1` for the internal stack trace (and note the launcher resets `ENVARGS`, so it must be added inside `serve_glm_autoround.sh`'s COMPILE_PATCH branch rather than in the outer environment). That last row is the state of the work: the changelist is one unresolved submodule-name lookup away from booting, and it must be cleared (plus whatever follows it) before the compile payoff can be measured. Two verified facts make the rest of the shape concrete: `suppress_errors` does **not** cover graph breaks (only `fullgraph=False` does), and the GLM trunk can never satisfy `fullgraph` because its indexer metadata syncs to host (`glm5next/amd/sparse_indexer.py:263,419`: `int(...max().item())`). ### Two structural constraints on any further fork work - **No new HIP kernels are possible.** The image ships `r4d.so` as a binary with no sources. The obvious second lever — the 9 % router — is gated `num_experts in {128, 256, 512}` in `router/r4d_route_router.py` and the binary contains only `r4d_moe_route_kernel<128|256|512>` instantiations. GLM has **288** experts, so it falls back to the generic sort-based top-k and **cannot be moved to the fused router without rebuilding libr4d**. Only Python/config/inductor changes (and runtime-JIT Triton) are available. - **`--kv-cache-dtype fp8` is a dead end for capacity too.** The plan's KV reserve is dtype-blind (1.76 GiB at 131,072 either way), so fp8 buys no arena and no window; it only removes the only MLA decode path gfx12 has (trap 1 above). ### DFlash2 for GLM — what the drafter actually is `incoai/GLM-5.3-Flash-DFlash2` is **not** a GLM-shaped drafter and needs no MLA/DSA port: its `config.json` declares `architectures: ["DFlash2DraftModel"]` and `model_type: "qwen3"` — 5 dense layers, hidden 4096, 32 heads / 8 kv heads, head_dim 128, sliding attention (window 2048), `is_causal: false`, `use_cache: false`, `dflash_config` = block 8, conv group 16, selector rank 256 / top-k 16, and **`target_layer_ids: [5, 14, 24, 33, 42]` against `num_target_layers: 45`**. The fork already maps that architecture: `registry.py:636 "DFlash2DraftModel": ("qwen3_dflash2", "DFlash2Qwen3ForCausalLM")`, and the spec method is `"dflash"` (`config/speculative.py:67`). So the port is **target-side only**: the GLM trunk must expose auxiliary hidden states at those five layer indices, the same interface `deepseek_v2.py` (also MLA+MoE) implements — `set_aux_hidden_state_layers()` / `get_eagle3_aux_hidden_state_layers()` plus capture at `idx in self.aux_hidden_state_layers` in the layer loop. `glm5next` implements neither. **The load was tried, and the gap is exactly one interface.** Payload fetched to `/home/dank/models/GLM-5.3-Flash-DFlash2` and hash-verified (`model.safetensors` 2,342,169,800 B, sha256 `b038e1d9…` = the Hub's LFS oid). Booting the engine with `--speculative-config '{"method":"dflash","model":"/draft","num_speculative_tokens":8}'` accepts the config and the drafter and dies at worker init with: ``` RuntimeError: Model does not support EAGLE3 interface ``` So nothing about the drafter, the method name, or the payload is wrong — the GLM trunk simply does not implement the aux-hidden-state contract the dflash runner requires. The reference is in this same image, twice: `deepseek_v2.py` (`set_aux_hidden_state_layers` / `get_eagle3_aux_hidden_state_layers` at :1948-1951, capture at :1554 and :1579) and the fork's own `qwen4_exp` trunk. The contract is small: - `self.aux_hidden_state_layers: tuple[int, ...]` on the trunk, default `()`, set by the wrapper's `set_aux_hidden_state_layers()`; - in the layer loop, `if idx in self.aux_hidden_state_layers: aux_hidden_states.append()` (DeepSeek appends `hidden_states + residual`, with a TP all-gather fixup when the rank holds fewer tokens than `positions`); - `Glm5NextModel.forward` returns `(hidden_states, aux_hidden_states)` when the list is non-empty; - `get_eagle3_aux_hidden_state_layers()` supplies a default triple when the drafter config omits `target_layer_ids` (this drafter provides `[5, 14, 24, 33, 42]`, so the runner derives trunk indices `[6, 15, 25, 34, 43]`). **The GLM-specific unknown** is what "the single-stream state entering layer k" means for a trunk whose layers carry mHC multi-stream state: DeepSeek's `(hidden_states, residual)` pair has no counterpart here — GLM's decoder layer returns `(hidden_states, residual, post, comb)` with `hc_expand`/`hc_pre` mixing `hc_mult` streams, so the plausible answer is the pre-mHC single-stream input `x` (4096-wide, matching the drafter's `hidden_size`), not a post-layer value. That is a semantic choice to validate by acceptance rate, not by inspection. **Budget no speedup.** Per the profile above, a verification pass pays pointwise cost proportional to its token count — the same reason MTP4 measured flat — and MTP4's acceptance was already excellent (3.76-4.90). The port is worth doing as *enabling work* (it is the prerequisite for any spec decode on this endpoint, and it is small), not as a performance fix, and the honest expectation on this shape is flat decode with a prefill regression like MTP's until the pointwise mass is fused. Note also that the KV-cap patch's predecessor arithmetic in [[dankserver-qwen38-fp8-expert-offload-tuning]] should be read the same way: its "gather-bound" conclusion came from the same throughput arithmetic that this page's profiler window has now falsified. ## Measured arms (all 2026-09-30, one boot each) | arm | decode | prefill | verdict | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | baseline int4, MAXLEN 131,072, util 0.92, NBATCH 2048 | 10.03 / 10.08 / 9.41 | 877 / 878 / 885 | qualified incumbent | | + `--expert-precise-memory` (arena 13.08 → 14.51 GiB) | 9.88 / 9.91 | 918 | **neutral** — proves residency is no longer the binding term | | + MTP4 spec decode (draft loads, acceptance excellent) | 9.64-11.16 | **255** | **rejected** — see below | | + MTP4 + explicit `--kv-cache-memory-bytes` (patched cap) | boots, 151,767-token KV | — | enabler for the MTP arm only | ### Why MTP is rejected here (it is not that it fails) MTP **works** on GLM in this fork: the head loads, the architecture resolves to `Glm5NextMTPModel`, and acceptance is excellent — ``` SpecDecoding metrics: Mean acceptance length: 3.83-4.90, Per-position acceptance rate: 0.917/0.833/0.583/0.500 … 0.962/0.846/0.692/0.615, Avg Draft acceptance rate: 69-97% ``` — and it buys **nothing**: decode 9.6-11.2 tok/s against 10.0 without it, while prefill **collapses 918 → 255 tok/s**. The reason is structural to offload: a verification forward gathers the **union** of the batch's experts, so spec decode amortizes compute but not a residency-bound gather. It also costs 2.6 GiB of arena. On a compute-bound (fully-resident) shape this would invert; here it does not. ## Served surface (verified 2026-09-30 against the live engine) | capability | state | evidence | | --- | --- | --- | | `/v1/models` | `glm53-flash`, max_model_len 131,072 | model list probe | | completion | yes | `bench_glm.py` runs above | | **tool calls** | **yes** — needs `--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser glm47` | a `get_weather` prompt returns `tool_calls: [{"id": "chatcmpl-tool-…", "type": "function", "function": {"name": "get_weather", "arguments": "{\"city\": \"Seattle\"}"}}]`, `finish_reason: tool_calls` | | **vision** | **yes** | a 64x64 solid-red PNG is answered "The image appears to be a solid red color…" | | reasoning channel | **yes** — needs `--reasoning-parser glm47` | without it the thinking leaks into `content` (measured: content began with the answer, then "Let me verify: … = 391", then a bare ` 2** (`is_aiter_found_and_supported()` → `get_cdna_version() > 2`). With fp8 KV the MTP draft step demands an op that cannot exist here: `RuntimeError: Worker failed with error ''_OpNamespace' 'vllm' object has no attribute 'rocm_aiter_mla_decode_fwd''`. KV dtype therefore stays auto/bf16. (`VLLM_ROCM_USE_AITER_MLA=1` does **not** help — the umbrella gate is the CDNA check, not the env var.) - **The capacity payoff is measured at zero.** The point of fp8 KV is fitting more tokens in the same reserve, and this fork's reserve model is **dtype-blind**: the fp8 boot printed the *identical* plan line as bf16 — `KV reserve 1.76 GiB (13600 B/token x 131072 + mamba pages)`. The reserve is dominated by the per-sequence KDA state (34 linear-attention layers) and the DSA indexer's pools, not by the MLA KV bytes those 13,600 B/token barely cover — so halving the KV dtype cannot move it. - **What a fix would take, if it were ever wanted**: a new fp8 path in the rope-free Triton kernels (`rocm_sparse_attn_prefill` / `rocm_sparse_attn_decode` in `v1/attention/ops/rocm_aiter_mla_sparse.py`) that dequantizes pages in-kernel, plus loosening `_use_rocm_sparse_triton()`. The fork's `_r4d_fp8_paged_mqa_logits` shows the author already has an fp8 MQA-logits path, but the sparse-MLA backend is not wired to it. Verdict 2026-09-30: **do not spend effort here** — the payoff is capacity, and the reserve is dtype-blind. 2. **The plan's KV reserve under-models this model, and the cap enforces the mistake.** The plan charges 13,600 B/token + a small mamba term, but GLM carries a per-sequence KDA state (34 linear-attention layers) and, under MTP, the draft's KV. `gpu_worker` then *caps* KV at that reserve, so a legal `--max-model-len` becomes unbootable: `ValueError: To serve at least one request with the model's max seq len (131072), (2.07 GiB KV cache is needed, which is larger than the available KV cache memory (1.74 GiB))`. Raising `max_model_len` only helps past ~440k tokens (the cap's slope is ~13,845 B/token vs the need's ~12,700 + 0.52 GiB fixed) — where the reserve would eat a third of the arena. `scripts/patches/gpu_worker-kv-cap.patch` lets an explicit operator KV request raise the cap; **it is not part of the deployed shape**, which boots on the plan's own reserve. 3. **A window is forced, not chosen.** The production `max_model_len 131072` is what the reserve model requires for this payload (below ~92k the boot refuses); it is not a capacity decision. 4. **Expert prefetch remains poison** — unchanged from the qwen campaign (36% precision, +40-51% decode from deleting it). No GLM arm re-opened it. ## Operations ```bash # rollback to the pre-cutover qwen FP8 + MTP4 shape (payload and R9V state # dirs are untouched on disk): git show 2339fae -- scripts/ | git apply # or: git checkout 2339fae -- scripts/ ./scripts/deploy.sh dankserver --service frank-primary # payload inventory (34 shards + 2 extras, weight-map index): bash scripts/download-frank-primary.sh --verify-only # live telemetry (needs the profiler window; with_stack=false is mandatory — # with stack the stop path hangs and the trace buffer grows to tens of GB): podman logs frank-primary-glm 2>&1 | grep "expert_lru.py" # boot: ~7 min warm page cache, longer cold; health returns 503 while loading curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" http://127.0.0.1:7770/health # experiment windows (production stopped + `systemctl mask --runtime`, which # self-clears at reboot) ran from the host-side scratch launcher # /home/dank/serve_glm_autoround.sh: env knobs MAXLEN SEQS NBATCH UTIL KVBYTES # KVDTYPE SPEC SPECJSON_FILE TOOLPARSER REASONINGPARSER TELEM GCHUNKS GLANES # PROFDIR GLM_PATCH_MOUNT COMPILE_PATCH GATHER_PATCH DRAFT_MOUNT ENVARGS. # DRAFT_MOUNT=1 mounts /home/dank/models/GLM-5.3-Flash-DFlash2 at /draft; # SPECJSON_FILE passes a whole --speculative-config JSON (JSON with no spaces, # word-split by the launcher's unquoted $EXTRA). bash /home/dank/serve_glm_autoround.sh ``` Boot gate: the engine refuses a legal-looking shape in two measured ways — the KV cap above, and the profile-run activation peak (`TritonMLA` indexer scores: 64 heads x 2,048 topk x NBATCH tokens x 2 B = 2.06 GiB at NBATCH 8192), which is what killed the first two boots at util 0.95. `PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True` is part of the qualified shape, not a tuning: the plan fills VRAM to its modelled headroom by design, so the default allocator's fragmentation fails the profile/graph-capture phase (measured on the deployed unit: "Tried to allocate 662.00 MiB. GPU 0 … 240.00 MiB is free"). The `deploy.sh` e2e gate also drives the admin panel's open-links spec, which walks every guarded vhost — including `http://192.168.0.112:8989/` on FrankBook-Pro. When that Mac mini is asleep the spec fails on a `page.goto` timeout and the deploy reports `DEPLOY INCOMPLETE` even though the engine is healthy; wake the host (magic packet to `de:6b:6d:c1:52:23`) or re-run `tests/e2e/run.sh` once it is up. Seen 2026-09-30: 32 passed, this one failed, and the WoL packet did not wake it (macOS "Wake for network access" needs toggling on the mini itself). ## Rollback targets | state | where | | --- | --- | | qwen FP8 + MTP4 (2026-09-29 → 09-30) | commit `2339fae`, payload `/home/dank/models/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Uncensored-FP8` | | R9V radiance Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Q8_0 | [[frank-primary-r9v-radiance-qwen38-q8]], state dirs `/home/dank/r9v-state/{q8xl,uncensored}` |