Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Frank d4ce76b68b refact(comments): state the mechanism, not the incident
Every comment that invoked a 'law' (50 word-boundary sites across 28
tracked files) now states what is going on and why, in terms that
transfer to any project: gate twins drift until one side greenlights
what the other refuses; a tag re-points while a digest pins; a
restrictive engine behavior belongs to the runtime that imposed it and
must be re-tested, not inherited; a speculative head is tensors in the
file, not a flag; snapshot links dangle where the container resolves
them; exit 0 is a clean stop to systemd, so a self-exiting daemon on
on-failure goes dark reporting success. Event narratives and dates are
gone from these comments; the mechanics carry the argument.

Behavior-identical: bash -n, py_compile, yaml parse, full bats suite
408/408 green. One symbol rename rides along (stack script local
scale_law -> scale_contract, with its log text).
2026-10-14 13:36:40 -07:00
Frank 319dd0f7da derive: restore the header read 2026-10-06 21:42:16 -07:00
Frank 650dfff5a2 derive: RADGRAM2 header is magic,k,rank,rows,domain (28 B) 2026-10-06 21:42:00 -07:00
Frank de70320cde derive-protected-experts: RADGRAM2 scan + 3%/3x law + parity fill from calib recording 2026-10-06 21:41:16 -07:00