refact(comments): state the mechanism, not the incident
Every comment that invoked a 'law' (50 word-boundary sites across 28 tracked files) now states what is going on and why, in terms that transfer to any project: gate twins drift until one side greenlights what the other refuses; a tag re-points while a digest pins; a restrictive engine behavior belongs to the runtime that imposed it and must be re-tested, not inherited; a speculative head is tensors in the file, not a flag; snapshot links dangle where the container resolves them; exit 0 is a clean stop to systemd, so a self-exiting daemon on on-failure goes dark reporting success. Event narratives and dates are gone from these comments; the mechanics carry the argument. Behavior-identical: bash -n, py_compile, yaml parse, full bats suite 408/408 green. One symbol rename rides along (stack script local scale_law -> scale_contract, with its log text).
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
65bd5ccea7
commit
d4ce76b68b
28 files changed
+195
-164
No files matched your search
@@ -72,9 +72,10 @@ set +a
|
||||
require_image "$FRANK_DRAGOON_IMAGE" \
|
||||
"pull it: podman pull docker://$FRANK_DRAGOON_IMAGE" || exit 1
|
||||
|
||||
# Size-exact gates on all three payload files: a truncated curl exits 0 on
|
||||
# some failures and a partial .hgn loads far enough to look alive, so the
|
||||
# byte counts from the Hub tree API are the contract (fleet fetch law).
|
||||
# Size-exact gates on all three payload files: a truncated download can
|
||||
# exit 0, and a partial .hgn loads far enough to look alive, so existence
|
||||
# proves nothing. The byte count published by the Hub tree API is the
|
||||
# contract: any other size is a different (broken) artifact.
|
||||
require_bytes "$FRANK_DRAGOON_MODEL_DIR/$FRANK_DRAGOON_CHECKPOINT" \
|
||||
checkpoint "$FRANK_DRAGOON_CHECKPOINT_BYTES" \
|
||||
"fetch it: bash scripts/download-frank-dragoon-flashnext.sh" || exit 1
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user