observability: LLM alerting rules, evaluated but not yet delivered
The scraped metrics have no rules over them, so every graph was read after the
fact by a human. This adds shared/prometheus/rules/llm-fleet.yml, loaded via
rule_files and installed by the same copier that ships prometheus.yml (a rule
file nothing loads evaluates nothing, and Prometheus reports no error for it):
LlmKvPoolSaturated kv pool > 90% for 10m — the 122,636-token wall
LlmRequestsQueueing waiting > 0 for 10m — MAXSEQS=4 reached
LlmPrefixCacheCollapse reuse < 20% for 15m with traffic — the thrash signature
LlmEndpointDown scrape target down 2m — both replicas gone
LlmLatencyHigh p95 end-to-end > 60s for 10m — what an operator feels
job:llm_prefix_cache_reuse:rate5m — recording rule shared by the alert and the
dashboard, so the two cannot drift
Every threshold is tied to something measured on this fleet, not to a guess,
and the file says plainly at the top that **nothing is notified**: there is no
Alertmanager here, so a firing alert reaches Prometheus' /alerts page, the
ALERTS metric and the dashboard panel added alongside it — and nowhere else.
Choosing how Frank actually gets paged is his call, not a missing config line.
Seam covers the silent failure mode: rules exist, the config references the
directory, the deployer installs it, and the dashboard graphs ALERTS.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ global:
|
||||
scrape_timeout: 10s
|
||||
evaluation_interval: 15s
|
||||
|
||||
# Alerting and recording rules for the LLM fleet. They evaluate and expose state
|
||||
# through /alerts, the ALERTS metric and the Grafana dashboard; nothing is
|
||||
# notified, because this stack has no Alertmanager (see the rules file header).
|
||||
rule_files:
|
||||
- /etc/prometheus/rules/*.yml
|
||||
|
||||
scrape_configs:
|
||||
# Prometheus itself
|
||||
- job_name: "prometheus"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
# Alerting and recording rules for the LLM fleet.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Thresholds are not guesses: each one corresponds to a failure mode measured on
|
||||
# this fleet on 2026-09-16 (see serverAppConfigs-docs/LLM/frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4.md).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# IMPORTANT: nothing is notified. There is no Alertmanager in this stack, so a
|
||||
# firing alert appears on Prometheus' /alerts page, in the ALERTS metric (which
|
||||
# the LLM fleet dashboard graphs) and nowhere else. Turning these into something
|
||||
# that reaches a person means adding an Alertmanager or using Grafana's own
|
||||
# alerting with a contact point — a decision about how Frank wants to be paged,
|
||||
# not a missing line of configuration.
|
||||
groups:
|
||||
- name: llm-fleet
|
||||
interval: 30s
|
||||
rules:
|
||||
# Recording rule so the dashboard and the alert below share one
|
||||
# expression. The exported series are counters; the rate is the reuse.
|
||||
- record: job:llm_prefix_cache_reuse:rate5m
|
||||
expr: |
|
||||
rate(vllm:prefix_cache_hits_total[5m])
|
||||
/ clamp_min(rate(vllm:prefix_cache_queries_total[5m]), 0.001)
|
||||
|
||||
# The capacity wall. Each R9700 carries 122,636 KV tokens; past ~90 %
|
||||
# the next large request queues or evicts a cached prefix.
|
||||
- alert: LlmKvPoolSaturated
|
||||
expr: vllm:kv_cache_usage_perc > 0.90
|
||||
for: 10m
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: "{{ $labels.job }}: KV pool above 90 % for 10 minutes"
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
A card's KV pool is nearly full. Expect queueing or cold re-prefills
|
||||
for large requests; the wall and its arithmetic are in the
|
||||
frank-medium runbook.
|
||||
|
||||
# Concurrency limit reached: MAXSEQS=4 per replica.
|
||||
- alert: LlmRequestsQueueing
|
||||
expr: vllm:num_requests_waiting > 0
|
||||
for: 10m
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: "{{ $labels.job }}: requests waiting for 10 minutes"
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
All sequence slots are busy and work is queueing. Either the fleet is
|
||||
genuinely busy or one endpoint is carrying it alone.
|
||||
|
||||
# The thrash signature measured on 2026-09-16: requests keep arriving but
|
||||
# almost none are served from cache, which is what three concurrent
|
||||
# 50-80k-token conversations do to a two-card fleet.
|
||||
- alert: LlmPrefixCacheCollapse
|
||||
expr: >-
|
||||
job:llm_prefix_cache_reuse:rate5m < 0.20
|
||||
and rate(vllm:prefix_cache_queries_total[5m]) > 0.05
|
||||
for: 15m
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
severity: info
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: "{{ $labels.job }}: prefix reuse below 20 % for 15 minutes"
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Nearly every request is prefilling from scratch. If several large
|
||||
contexts are in flight together, this is the capacity wall rather
|
||||
than a routing fault — placement and admission were both measured
|
||||
and neither fixes it.
|
||||
|
||||
# The endpoint, not the replica: two replicas serve :7770 through the
|
||||
# proxy, so this fires only when both are down (a single restart is
|
||||
# invisible — the proxy fails over).
|
||||
- alert: LlmEndpointDown
|
||||
expr: up{job=~"frank-.*"} == 0
|
||||
for: 2m
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
severity: critical
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: "{{ $labels.job }}: scrape target down for 2 minutes"
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Prometheus cannot reach the LLM endpoint. Check the host's units:
|
||||
systemctl --user is-active frank-medium-{a,b,pro} on Dankclaw's
|
||||
peers (frank-large) or Dankserver (frank-medium).
|
||||
|
||||
# What an operator actually feels: wall-clock per request, prefill
|
||||
# included. A cold 50k-token prefill alone is ~22 s on one card.
|
||||
- alert: LlmLatencyHigh
|
||||
expr: >-
|
||||
histogram_quantile(0.95,
|
||||
sum by (le, job) (rate(vllm:e2e_request_latency_seconds_bucket[10m]))) > 60
|
||||
for: 10m
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
severity: warning
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: "{{ $labels.job }}: p95 request latency above 60 s for 10 minutes"
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Requests are taking a minute or more end to end. On this hardware
|
||||
that is usually large contexts competing for one card's KV pool.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user