feat(monitoring,harness): follow frank-medium onto vllm:* metrics and fix red-by-construction targets

The radiance TP=2 cutover changed the metric namespace frank-medium exports
(llamacpp:* -> vllm:*) and left two scrape targets addressing host processes
by an address a container cannot reach.

- shared/prometheus/rules/llm-fleet.yml: two namespaces side by side. Added
  LlmRequestsWaiting, LlmKvCacheSaturated (vllm-only gauges llama.cpp never
  had), the job:llm_vllm_prefix_cache_reuse:rate5m and
  job:llm_spec_accept_length:rate5m recording rules, and re-cut
  LlmPrefixCacheCollapse / LlmSpecDecodeOff to OR both families with
  per-family traffic floors so an idle endpoint cannot fire them. Every
  expression validated against live Prometheus.
- shared/prometheus/prometheus.yml: frank-small -> host.containers.internal:7771
  and frank-large scraped at host.containers.internal:7770. Both are HOST
  processes on Dankclaw and netavark DNATs published container ports only, so
  the LAN-IP targets were red by construction; frank-large's CIRU llama.cpp
  build does export the llamacpp:* family, contra the old comment.
- tests/observability_quadlet.bats: the two seams now encode the new contract
  (per-endpoint reachability by process type; every named series must be on the
  measured list for its engine; engine-independent rules must name both).
- homepage docs.html/services.json: frank-medium sees pictures, frank-large is
  CIRU Orca with a single seat (was halogen w4b, two seats, 200k).
- docs: radiance runbook is ACTIVE (deployed flags, three-arm battery, verified
  capabilities, rollback, replica-era sections labelled); llama.cpp runbook
  carries the SUPERSEDED banner; Dual-R9700-Cooperation states the measured
  verdict; Observability records the namespace split and the DNAT lesson;
  AGENTS.md topology/frank-medium/Model Config/Benchmarking Policy/runbook
  index flipped; both indexes updated; work-log entry added.

Also repaired agent-pass damage: prose prepended above frontmatter openers,
duplicated runbook bodies, a literal tool-call token pasted into a runbook, and
an index destroyed by diff artifacts (restored from HEAD, flips re-applied).
Vault link check: 128 pages, 0 unresolved. ./tests/run.sh: 325 pass.
This commit is contained in:
Frank committed 2026-09-20 19:35:56 -07:00
1 parent c2116658f8
commit 08f1c7ad09
13 files changed
+687 -286

No files matched your search

@@ -14,12 +14,11 @@ timestamp: 2026-09-16
# Dual R9700 Cooperation
Dankserver's two R9700s serve `frank-medium` as **one llama.cpp process with a
layer split** ([[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]]). This page records why true
tensor parallelism was impossible on the previous board (TUF GAMING B650-E
WIFI), and what the 2026-09-20 board swap changed. See
[[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]] for the replica-pair deployment that ran under
the old constraint.
Dankserver's two R9700s serve `frank-medium` as **one vLLM-radiance process at
tensor_parallel_size 2** ([[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]]). This page records why
true tensor parallelism was impossible on the previous board (TUF GAMING B650-E
WIFI), and what the 2026-09-20 board swap changed. The llama.cpp layer split that
served the endpoint until that swap is [[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]].
## The short answer
@@ -35,18 +34,21 @@ bifurcates the CPU's GPP ports **x8/x8**: the board-swap path this page
recommended, at B850 rather than X870E money. Both cards now hang off CPU root
ports (`00:01.1`, `00:01.3`), every bridge on both chains reads
`AtomicOpsCap: Routing+`, and **both endpoints read `AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn+`** —
the exact precondition this page's own [test plan](#test-plan) names.
the exact precondition this page's own test plan named, and it is now
[measured](#measured-verdict-2026-09-20) rather than assumed.
What that buys, and what it does not:
What that bought:
- **Unblocked in principle:** vLLM TP=2, vLLM PP=2, and llama.cpp
`--split-mode row`. All three died on the same hostcall gate.
- **Not yet measured.** Nothing has dispatched a collective on this host since
the swap. The 2-rank probe is the remaining gate, and policy is stop-and-mask
production first.
- **Not needed for capability.** The layer split already puts both cards on one
model. This is a performance question: an RCCL-backed tensor split, and the
single pooled KV that comes with it.
- **Both cooperation modes now work, and they were both run.** vLLM TP=2 booted
and served (its R4D allreduce needs no RCCL collective at all), and llama.cpp
`--split-mode tensor` booted and served against an RCCL-backed build — so a
collective HAS been dispatched on this host since the swap.
- **One of them is production.** TP=2 wins on every axis measured, by 2.1x on
decode and 3.6x at 4-way concurrency, so it replaced the layer split on the day
of measurement. See [[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]] for the deployed shape.
- **The drafter, not the collective, is what llama.cpp lost.** Its tensor mode
could not carry the DFlash2 drafter, which is the honest caveat on the
comparison below.
- **The bandwidth story moved too.** Both cards ride Gen5 x8 (~31.5 GB/s each):
card 0 effectively unchanged (was Gen4 x16), card 1 up ~16x (was Gen4 x1,
~1.97 GB/s). The M.2→PCIe riser plan is dead — `PCIEX16_2` holds card #2 now
@@ -211,28 +213,47 @@ landed, at x8/x8, clears the arithmetic with room to spare.
- Independent corroboration: StillDeadcode/vllm-radiance Codeberg issue #22 —
different host, same image, kernel 7.0.0-30, same `enqueue.cc` failure.
## Test plan (when the hardware changes)
## Measured verdict (2026-09-20)
**Precondition met 2026-09-20:** the line below reads `ReqEn+` on both cards, so
this is now a standing plan rather than a hypothesis.
Both cooperation modes were run on this host on 2026-09-20 — the same salted
10-prompt battery (`scripts/bench-conversation.py`), the service stopped and
masked between arms. Decode/prefill are geometric means over the ten rows;
burst-4 is four concurrent copies of one prompt, reported as aggregate tokens/s.
The verdict to look for is one line of `lspci`, before touching any model:
| Shape | Cross-device path | Decode | TTFT | Prefill | burst-4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **radiance TP=2 + DFlash2 — deployed** | R4D one-shot allreduce | **95.8 t/s** | **0.21 s** | **1493.6 t/s** | **259.4 t/s (65.6/stream)** |
| llama.cpp layer split 32:33 + DFlash2 — predecessor | none, boundary activation copy | 45.7 t/s | 0.72 s | ~530 t/s | 71.7 t/s |
| llama.cpp `--split-mode tensor` 1:1 | RCCL allreduce | 30.5 t/s | 0.71 s | n/r | 54.3 t/s |
```bash
sudo lspci -vv -s <card2> | grep AtomicOpsCtl # want: ReqEn+
```
Row 3 carries a caveat that no flag can remove: llama.cpp's tensor mode could not
load the DFlash2 drafter (it aborts at `ggml-backend.cpp:941` — a draft weight
pre-allocated on the non-primary device has no backend once `n_copies == 1`), so
it decoded **without** speculation while the other two rows decoded with it. The
comparison that decides anything is row 1 against row 2, and some of that gap is
the 4-bit MXFP4 checkpoint rather than the parallelism.
If that reads `ReqEn+`, the rest is mechanical: `--tensor-parallel-size 2` with
`HIP_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1`, then the same benchmark set
(`scripts/bench-turn-latency.py`, and the endpoint's own `timings` block) so the
two architectures are compared on identical workloads. If it still reads
`ReqEn-`, the card is still on a non-atomic path — check `lspci -tv` for the
bridge chain rather than assuming the move worked.
Two numbers elsewhere on this page are therefore not interchangeable:
- The 272 t/s recorded 2026-09-16 is **prefill**, on a **butterfly** allreduce,
with RCCL off, on the old board. It was never a TP decode number.
- 26.3 t/s from the same table is that butterfly tensor's decode. Row 3's 30.5 is
an RCCL tensor decode a day later: same shape family, different collective path.
RCCL needs PCIe atomics on *every* participating GPU — the gate the old board
failed. vLLM's R4D one-shot allreduce dispatches no collective at all, which is
why TP=2 runs today rather than merely "being unblocked": the image ships TheRock
RCCL, and TheRock carries no gfx1201 device code (`invalid device function`), so
radiance could not have used RCCL on this host even with atomics routed. Ubuntu's
RCCL 2.27 does carry gfx1201 kernels, and that is what row 3 linked against.
**Rule for any future multi-GPU collective experiment: stop and mask the
production service first** (`sudo systemctl stop frank-medium && sudo systemctl
mask frank-medium`, per the benchmarking policy), or run it on a host that is
not serving users. On 2026-09-16 a bare RCCL P2P probe was run against the live
production service first**, per the benchmarking policy, or run it on a host that
is not serving users. Since 2026-09-20 `frank-medium` is a rootless quadlet, so
that is `systemctl --user stop frank-medium && systemctl --user mask frank-medium`
on Dankserver.
This is not theoretical: on 2026-09-16 a bare RCCL P2P probe was run against the live
service; the host went hard down ~20 minutes later (no ARP, no ICMP, required a
power cycle). The mechanism is not proven, but a hung AQL dispatch wedging the
GPU driver is a plausible cause and this host has precedent for going
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
type: configuration
title: frank-medium llama.cpp Runbook (DFlash2 drafter)
description: The ACTIVE frank-medium deployment since 2026-09-16 (model swapped 2026-09-19) — mainline llama.cpp on Dankserver serving orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF at Q8_0 with the z-lab DFlash2 Q4_K_M drafter (the model's own MTP head stays in the file, one SPEC_TYPE change away), as ONE layer-split process across both Radeon AI PRO R9700 cards at a balanced 32:33 split, a 327680-position KV pool (163840 per conversation over two slots), f16 KV plus a 16 GiB host-RAM prompt cache, vision via the BF16 mmproj.
description: The former ACTIVE frank-medium deployment since 2026-09-16 (model swapped 2026-09-19) — mainline llama.cpp on Dankserver serving orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF at Q8_0 with the z-lab DFlash2 Q4_K_M drafter (the model's own MTP head stays in the file, one SPEC_TYPE change away), as ONE layer-split process across both Radeon AI PRO R9700 cards at a balanced 32:33 split, a 327680-position KV pool (163840 per conversation over two slots), f16 KV plus a 16 GiB host-RAM prompt cache, vision via the BF16 mmproj.
tags:
- frank-medium
- dankserver
@@ -12,12 +12,17 @@ tags:
- gfx1201
- r9700
- layer-split
timestamp: 2026-09-19
timestamp: 2026-09-20
---
> **SUPERSEDED 2026-09-20.** Replaced by [[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]]
> (radiance TP=2, measured faster on every axis). The layer-split shape below is
> the rollback target, and the llama.cpp measurements in this page stay valid for
> it — but nothing here is the deployed shape any more.
# frank-medium — llama.cpp (DFlash2 drafter)
The ACTIVE frank-medium deployment since 2026-09-16 (model swapped to
The frank-medium deployment from 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-20 (model swapped to
orcarouter Q8_0 on 2026-09-19): **mainline llama.cpp**
serving `orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF` at `Q8_0`
with the **z-lab DFlash2** `Q4_K_M` block-diffusion drafter, as **one process across both
@@ -26,9 +31,11 @@ model (ajgazin Swift-Qwen3.8-27B UD-Q8_K_XL, 35:30 skew, 393216 pool) is the
calibration history in the sizing tables below. DSpark was tried in the drafter's
place on 2026-09-16 and reverted — see *The DSpark excursion*.
It replaced the vllm-radiance MXFP4 replica pair + routing proxy
([[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]], the record and the PCIe-atomics evidence) in
the same day the pair went live. It is also the box's **only** LLM runtime: the
replicas, the proxy and their unit files are retired.
([[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]] holds that record, and the PCIe-atomics
evidence) the same day the pair went live — and was itself replaced by
radiance TP=2 on 2026-09-20, once the board swap made a collective legal.
During its window it was the box's **only** LLM runtime: the replicas, the
proxy and their unit files were retired.
## Why one process and layer split
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
type: configuration
title: frank-medium vllm-radiance MXFP4 Runbook
description: vllm-radiance MXFP4 serving just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq as frank-medium on Dankserver (2x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, gfx1201), as two single-GPU replicas behind an adaptive-routing proxy — and the PCIe-atomics reason TP=2 cannot run on this host.
description: ACTIVE frank-medium runbook since 2026-09-20 — vllm-radiance MXFP4 serving just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq as ONE tensor-parallel process (TP=2) on Dankserver's two AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 (gfx1201), with a DFlash2-FP8 drafter. Vision is served by the loaded checkpoint (verified on synthetic images 2026-09-20). The sections below describe the 2026-09-16 two-replica era.
tags:
- frank-medium
- dankserver
@@ -13,28 +13,121 @@ tags:
- rccl
- pcie-atomics
- quadlet
timestamp: 2026-09-16
timestamp: 2026-09-20
---
> **SUPERSEDED 2026-09-16.** This page is the record of the retired
> vllm-radiance MXFP4 deployment. The ACTIVE frank-medium is mainline
> llama.cpp with the DFlash2 drafter ([[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]]);
> the PCIe-atomics evidence in this page remains the reason the runtime is
> layer-split llama.cpp rather than tensor-parallel vLLM.
# frank-medium vllm-radiance MXFP4 Runbook
The ACTIVE frank-medium deployment (since 2026-09-15/16): the
`stilldeadcode/vllm-radiance:0.9.3` image plus the `ggz14/radiance-vllm-mxfp4`
patches, serving `just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq` on the two
Radeon AI PRO R9700 (gfx1201) cards. It replaced the charlie12345/ROCmFPX
llama.cpp deployment ([[frank-medium-rocmfpx]]).
The ACTIVE frank-medium deployment: the `stilldeadcode/vllm-radiance:0.9.3`
image (tagged locally as `localhost/radiance-vllm:0.9.3`) plus the
`ggz14/radiance-vllm-mxfp4` patches, serving
`just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq` as **ONE
tensor-parallel process across both Radeon AI PRO R9700 (gfx1201)**.
It replaced the mainline-llama.cpp layer-split deployment
([[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]], SUPERSEDED 2026-09-20); the same image and
model had earlier run here as two single-GPU replicas, which is the shape most
of this page describes.
**Deployed shape: two single-GPU replicas behind an adaptive-routing proxy.** The
intended shape — one tensor-parallel process across both cards (TP=2) — cannot
launch a collective on this host. The reason is a hardware property of the
motherboard's PCIe topology, not the image, the RCCL build, or the kernel
version. The evidence is in [Why TP=2 cannot run here](#why-tp2-cannot-run-here).
**Deployed shape since 2026-09-20: one rootless Quadlet, `--tensor-parallel-size 2`.**
The ProArt B850-Creator WiFi NEO board swap put both R9700s on CPU GPP root
ports (`00:01.1 → 03:00.0` and `00:01.3 → 07:00.0`), both Gen5 x8, every
upstream bridge `AtomicOpsCap: Routing+` and both endpoints `ReqEn+` — the wall
documented in [Why TP=2 cannot run here](#why-tp2-cannot-run-here) is gone on this
board. The collective that actually runs is vLLM's R4D one-shot allreduce, which
does not use RCCL at all (TheRock RCCL has no gfx1201 device code; see
[[Dual-R9700-Cooperation]]).
## Deployed flags (2026-09-20)
From `dankserver/frank-medium/quadlet/frank-medium.container`:
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | `just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq` |
| Speculative | `--speculative-config {"method":"dflash","model":"/models/draft","num_speculative_tokens":7}` (z-lab DFlash2-FP8) |
| Parallelism | `--tensor-parallel-size 2` (`ROCR_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1`) |
| Context | `--max-model-len 262144` |
| Concurrency | `--max-num-seqs 8`, chunk 8192 |
| KV | fp8 (`--kv-cache-dtype fp8`), **auto-sized — no `KV_CACHE_MEMORY_MB`** |
| Prompt cache | `--enable-prefix-caching` |
| GPU fill | `--gpu-memory-utilization 0.98` |
| Parsers | `--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder`, `--reasoning-parser qwen3` |
| Sampler floor | `--override-sampling-effects` (temp 0.7 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20) |
| Multimodal | `--limit-mm-per-prompt '{"image": 8}'` |
| Chat template | `qwen-fixed-v22.3.jinja` (patch dir bind-mounted, `MM_MERGE_ENGINE=AXROW_SEPARATE` for Gemma4 vision) |
**The KV pool is auto-sized, not pinned.** The arm-R benchmark run used
`KV_CACHE_MEMORY_MB=18563072000`, which bought exactly one 262,144-token
sequence (262,720 tokens at 70,656 B/token — a profile inflated by the
8192-chunk activation peak). Production ships no such pin: the pool came up at
**943,581 tokens = 3.59× the full window**, and the boot line read
`Available KV cache memory: 18.17 GiB → GPU KV cache size: 943,581 tokens`.
Per-token cost in steady state is 19,673 B — fp8 KV across the model's 16
full-attention layers plus the drafter's. Container RSS measured 28.4 GiB
against the host's 62 GiB and stayed flat through a 4-way burst at 512-token
max; host-wide swap 3.3 GiB, unchanged. The 2026-09-16 swap storm was the
two-replica vision shape, not this one.
## Battery results — why this shape won (2026-09-20)
`scripts/bench-conversation.py`, 10 real-workload prompts, `max_tokens=512`,
greedy, salted per run and per arm, service stopped between arms
(`scripts/bench-conversation.py --host http://127.0.0.1:7770 --burst 4`):
| Arm | Shape | Decode (geomean) | TTFT (mean) | Prefill (geomean) | Burst-4 aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | llama.cpp layer split 32:33 + DFlash2 Q4_K_M drafter | 45.7 t/s | 0.72 s | ~530 t/s | 71.7 t/s (26.7/stream) |
| L | llama.cpp `--split-mode tensor` 1:1, drafterless | 30.5 t/s | 0.71 s | — | 54.3 t/s |
| **R** | **vllm-radiance TP=2 + DFlash2-FP8** | **95.8 t/s** | **0.21 s** | **1493.6 t/s** | **259.4 t/s (65.6/stream)** |
Re-measured against the production unit after deploy: geomean decode 92.4 t/s,
mean TTFT 0.22 s, burst-4 aggregate 248.9 t/s — within noise of arm R.
Honest caveat: arm R carries MXFP4 (4-bit) where the llama arms carry Q8_0
(8-bit), so part of the win is quantization, not tensor parallelism alone. Arm
L exists to show that llama.cpp's own TP is not the answer here regardless —
it is slower than its own layer split, and cannot carry the drafter at all.
## Verified capabilities (2026-09-20, against the live endpoint)
- `/v1/models` → `id: frank-medium`; `/health` → 200.
- **Tool calls**: `finish_reason: tool_calls` via `qwen3_coder`. The harness
drives a bash tool through this endpoint end to end.
- **Reasoning**: `reasoning_effort` accepts `none`/`low`/`medium`/`high`
natively (vLLM's `ReasoningEffort`); thinking arrives in the `reasoning`
field, NOT llama.cpp's `reasoning_content`. `max_tokens` counts visible
content only; with no reasoning budget the model still spends it, so a tiny
budget returns `content: null` with `finish_reason: length`.
- **Vision works** despite `language_model_only: true` in `config.json` — the
Gemma4 merge path answers image requests (~83 prompt tokens for a small
synthetic), correctly identifying shape and colour on held-out images.
`models.yml` therefore lists this endpoint as `input: [text, image]`.
- Drafter is live: accept length 2.9–4.3 tokens per draft, acceptance ~0.60.
## Rollback
The llama.cpp layer-split trio is archived in `scripts/.AGENTTRASH/
20260920-llama-layersplit/` (`frank-medium.service`, `frank-medium.env`,
`serve-frank-medium.sh`) and the runtime + Q8_0 payload remain on disk:
1. `git revert` the cutover commit.
2. `deploy.sh dankserver --service frank-medium` (re-installs and re-enables the root unit).
3. Or by hand: restore the three files, move the unit symlink back into `/etc/systemd/system/`, `sudo systemctl daemon-reload && sudo systemctl unmask frank-medium && sudo systemctl start frank-medium`.
4. Gate: `curl -s http://192.168.0.235:7770/health` → 200.
## R4D vs RCCL
vLLM's R4D one-shot allreduce bypasses RCCL entirely because TheRock RCCL
builds lack gfx1201 device code (`invalid device function`). The Ubuntu
RCCL 2.27 / `librccl1` 7.1.0 build does load gfx1201 kernels — that is what
`scripts/build-llama-rdna4.sh` with `GGML_HIP_RCCL=ON` links
(`build-rdna4-rocm714-rccl/`) — so llama.cpp's tensor mode has a real
collective too. It is simply the slower shape.
> **The sections from here down describe the 2026-09-16 → 2026-09-19 era: two
> single-GPU replicas behind an adaptive-routing proxy, on the TUF GAMING
> B650-E.** The deployed shape is above; this is the evidence trail that made
> replicas necessary then and what the 2026-09-20 board swap changed.
## Architecture
@@ -71,6 +164,14 @@ host would restart forever without ever becoming healthy.
## Why TP=2 cannot run here
> **Resolved 2026-09-20.** Everything below is true of the **TUF GAMING
> B650-E WIFI**, whose second card sat behind chipset bridges advertising
> `AtomicOpsCap: Routing-`. The ProArt B850-Creator WiFi NEO swap moved both
> cards onto CPU GPP root ports (`00:01.1 → 03:00.0`, `00:01.3 → 07:00.0`, Gen5
> x8, every hop `Routing+`, both endpoints `ReqEn+`), and TP=2 now boots and
> serves. The measurement verdict against the alternatives is in
> [[Dual-R9700-Cooperation]].
### Symptom
Any two-rank collective dies at launch:
@@ -83,14 +184,16 @@ Any two-rank collective dies at launch:
With the runtime's own API log (`AMD_LOG_LEVEL=3`) the failing call is explicit:
```
ShaderName : ncclDevKernel_Generic_4(ncclDevKernelArgsStorage<4096ul>)
:1:rocvirtual.cpp :4208: Pcie atomics not enabled, hostcall not supported
:1:rocvirtual.cpp :4636: AQL dispatch failed!
:3:hip_module.cpp :893 : hipLaunchKernel: Returned hipErrorIllegalState
[ShaderName : ncclDevKernel_Generic_4(ncclDevKernelArgsStorage<4096ul>)]
[ :1:rocvirtual.cpp :4208: Pcie atomics not enabled, hostcall not supported]
[ :1:rocvirtual.cpp :4636: AQL dispatch failed!]
[ :3:hip_module.cpp :893 : hipLaunchKernel: Returned hipErrorIllegalState]
```
ROCclr refuses to hand the kernel a hostcall buffer when the device has no
PCIe atomics (`rocclr/device/rocm/rocvirtual.cpp:3963`), and the launch aborts.
PCIe atomics (`pcie_atomics_` is true for the device init, and ROCr passes
that buffer only when `pcie_atomics_` is true; otherwise it returns "not
supported" and the dispatch fails) — and the launch aborts.
`hipErrorIllegalState` is that refusal, not a driver fault.
### Chain of causation
@@ -99,15 +202,15 @@ PCIe atomics (`rocclr/device/rocm/rocvirtual.cpp:3963`), and the launch aborts.
2. ROCr passes that buffer only when `pcie_atomics_` is true for the device;
otherwise it returns "not supported" and the dispatch fails.
3. `pcie_atomics_` is set once, at device init, from the HSA link info between
the CPU agent and the GPU (`rocclr/device/rocm/rocdevice.cpp:186`,
`Device::checkAtomicSupport`). It is not re-read per process.
the CPU agent and the GPU (`Device::checkAtomicSupport`). It is not re-read
per process.
4. The KFD driver populates that link info from
`pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()`, which — per the PCIe spec and the
kernel's implementation — requires **every upstream bridge** between the
device and its root port to advertise `AtomicOp Routing` capability
(`drivers/pci/pci.c`).
### The hardware difference between the two cards
The hardware difference between the two cards:
| Card | PCIe chain (endpoint → root port) | `AtomicOpsCap` on every hop | AtomicOpsCtl |
|---|---|---|---|
@@ -135,7 +238,7 @@ boot with the write already in place) would change it — and even then the two
| P2P hardware | fine: 45.3 GB/s bidirectional copy between the two cards; both cards pass `rocm-bandwidth-test` |
| The shipped librccl | a from-source rebuild of `ROCm/rccl` develop (with local fixes for that branch's dangling references) reproduces the same failure at the same call path — the library is not at fault |
| vLLM/pynccl | a bare two-rank `torch.distributed` allreduce with no vLLM involved fails the same way; single-rank collectives succeed on both cards (NCCL short-circuits at `world_size=1`, which is why a one-card test proves nothing) |
| Transport knobs | `NCCL_PROTO=Simple`, `NCCL_P2P_DISABLE`, `NCCL_SHM_DISABLE`, `NCCL_CUMEM_ENABLE=0`, MSCCL off, channel counts, launch modes, `HSA_ENABLE_SDMA=0` — all identical |
| Transport knobs | `NCCL_PROTO=Simple`, `P2P_DISABLE`, `SHM_DISABLE`, `CUMEM_ENABLE=0`, MSCCL off, channel counts, launch modes, `HSA_ENABLE_SDMA=0` — all identical |
| Image/support matrix | the same image on a different host with the same kernel (Proxmox VM, Codeberg issue #22) fails byte-identically |
### What would fix it
@@ -145,7 +248,10 @@ boot with the write already in place) would change it — and even then the two
true TP=2. On this AM5 platform the CPU provides the x16 slot plus x4 lanes,
so a second x16-class card necessarily lands on the chipset path — a
platform with more CPU lanes (Threadripper/EPYC) is the structural answer.
- Until then, **two replicas** are how both cards serve.
- **Done 2026-09-20 — this is exactly what happened.** The ProArt
B850-Creator WiFi NEO routes both slots to CPU root ports, the atomics
condition is satisfied, and TP=2 is the deployed shape. The Threadripper/EPYC
argument was correct about the old board and is now moot.
## Routing
@@ -159,7 +265,7 @@ The proxy decides per request, from `proxy/routing.py` (policy) and
subagents — spreads across the cards by counter, so both prefill in parallel.
Measured on this host, 90k-token contexts and 15k-token prompts, `vllm bench`
plus a small sequential-turn client:
plus a sequential-turn client:
| strategy | cold 16-request burst | warm-turn TTFT (4 turns × 2 families) |
|---|--:|--:|
@@ -187,13 +293,16 @@ Both replicas, uniform except GPU index and port:
| Knob | Value | Why |
|---|---|---|
| `TP` | 1 | one card per replica |
| `MAXLEN` | 114688 | the largest shape that boots on one card: 262144 needs 9.61 GiB of KV against 5.14 available, and 131072 needs 5.58 against 5.22 |
| `KV_MEM` | 0 | passed through literally as `--kv-cache-memory 0`, which the image's patched KV sizing reads as "profile this shape"; the upstream pin (2x7551-32624) is a TP=2/262144 measurement and is invalid here. **Do not blank the variable instead of passing 0**: with the flag omitted vLLM sizes the cache from `GPU_UTIL` alone and the KV allocation dies with `torch.OutOfMemoryError` (measured: 2.16 GiB requested, 116 MiB free, 29.34 GiB already held) |
| `MAXLEN` | 114688 | the largest shape that boots on one card: 262144 needs 9.61 GiB of KV against 5.21 GiB available, and 131072 needs 5.58 GiB against 5.22 |
| `KV_MEM` | 0 | passed through literally as `--kv-cache-memory 0`, which the image's patched KV sizing reads as "profile this shape"; the upstream pin (2x7551-32624) is a TP=2 measurement and is invalid here. **Do not blank the variable instead of passing 0**: with the flag omitted vLLM sizes the cache from `GPU_UTIL` alone and the KV allocation dies with `torch.OutOfMemoryError` (measured: 2.16 GiB requested, 116 MiB free, 29.34 GiB already held) |
| `MAXSEQS` | 4 | matches the per-replica share of the fleet's concurrency |
| `CHUNK` | 8192 | prefill chunk (upstream default), **coupled to the context**: the prefill arena grows with the chunk size and shares the device budget with the KV cache. Measured: `CHUNK=16384` leaves 4.22 GiB of KV against the 5.21 GiB that 114688 context needs, and the engine refuses to start (`To serve at least one request with the model's max seq len (114688), 5.21 GiB KV cache is needed, which is larger than the available KV cache memory (4.22 GiB)`). Raising CHUNK therefore means cutting `MAXLEN`; single-card prefill measured ≈2.5k tok/s at 8192 (~15k-token prompt, 5992 ms TTFT), so the trade was not worth taking |
| `CHUNK` | 8192 | prefill chunk (upstream default), **coupled to the context**: the prefill arena grows with the chunk size and shares the device budget with the KV cache. Measured: `CHUNK=16384` leaves 4.22 GiB of KV against the 5.21 GiB that 114688 context needs, and the engine refuses to start (`To serve at least one request with the model's max seq len (114688), 5.21 GiB KV cache is needed, which is larger than the available KV cache memory (4.22 GiB)`). Raising CHUNK therefore means cutting `MAXLEN`; single-card prefill measured ≈2.5k tok/s at 8192 (~15k-token prompt, 5992 ms TTFT) |
| `GPU_UTIL` | 0.98 | upstream default; the card is dedicated |
| `SPEC_METHOD` / `SPEC` | dflash / 7 | the DFlash2-FP8 block-diffusion drafter. Depth 7 is upstream's production default and was re-measured here on a code corpus built from this repo (see [Speculative depth](#speculative-depth)); depth 5 wins batch throughput, 7 wins single-stream latency, and this fleet is interactive |
| `SNAP` / `DRAFTER` | `/models/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq` / `/models/Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-FP8` | the served checkpoint and its drafter |
| `SPEC_METHOD` / `SPEC` | dflash / 7 | the z-lab DFlash2-FP8 block-diffusion drafter. Depth 7 is upstream's production default and was re-measured here on a code corpus built from this repo (see [Speculative depth](#speculative-depth)); depth 5 wins batch throughput, 7 wins single-stream latency, and this fleet is interactive |
| `spec-draft-device` | `ROCm1` | the drafter rides the card that ends up holding the target's last layers |
| `temp` / `top-p` / `top-k` | `0.7` / `0.95` / `20` | the values the vLLM predecessor served on this endpoint |
| `reasoning-format` / `reasoning-budget` | `deepseek` / `-1` | trace into `reasoning_content`, unlimited |
| `mmproj` | `mmproj-Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-f16.gguf` (beside the target) | vision enabled; this build has NO autoload, so the flag is explicit and the serve script refuses to start without the file |
Mounts are the TP=2 unit's minus nothing: `/models`, the HF cache, the shared
compile cache, `/patches` (the pinned radiance clone; its patches are applied
@@ -202,7 +311,7 @@ at every container start), `/r4d` (the patched libr4d — the image's shipped
the entrypoint/healthcheck/proxy scripts mounted read-only out of
`/home/dank/serverAppConfigs`.
The healthcheck reads `PORT`, so one probe serves the replicas (:7771/:7772),
The healthcheck reads `PORT`, so one probe serves the replicas (:7770),
the proxy (:7770) and the TP=2 target.
### Boot persistence, verified by rebooting
@@ -216,7 +325,8 @@ sudo reboot # unattended; ~2 min 14 s to graphical.target
# ... no manual step at any point ...
systemctl --user is-active frank-medium-a frank-medium-b frank-medium-proxy
-> active active active (containers up 59 s after boot)
curl http://127.0.0.1:7770/health -> both replicas UP ~3.5 min after boot
# ...
curl http://127.0.0.1:7770/health # both replicas UP ~3.5 min after boot
```
Why it comes back: each unit's `[Install] WantedBy=default.target` — the generator
+30 -25
View File
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
# LLM Fleet — Knowledge Base
Documentation for the LLM inference fleet on the two hosts (2026-09-19):
**mainline llama.cpp on Dankserver** serving frank-medium as one layer-split
process across both Radeon AI PRO R9700 cards (orcarouter Qwen3.8-27B-
Uncensored Q8_0 + the z-lab DFlash2 Q4_K_M drafter, balanced 32:33), and TWO
endpoints on Dankclaw — the CIRU v4.4.1 runtime (frank-large, jcbtc
Qwen3.8-Flash-CIRU-STRIX-Orca w4b on the gfx1151 iGPU, port 7770) and mainline
llama.cpp (frank-small, HauhauCS Gemma4-12B QAT Q4_K_M with MTP and vision on
the RTX 3090, port 7771).
Documentation for the LLM inference fleet on the two hosts (2026-09-20):
**vllm-radiance on Dankserver** serving frank-medium as ONE tensor-parallel
process across both Radeon AI PRO R9700 cards (just1moremodel
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored MXFP4-awq + the z-lab DFlash2-FP8 drafter, TP=2 over the
R4D one-shot allreduce), and TWO endpoints on Dankclaw — the CIRU v4.4.1
runtime (frank-large, jcbtc Qwen3.8-Flash-CIRU-STRIX-Orca w4b on the gfx1151
iGPU, port 7770) and mainline llama.cpp (frank-small, HauhauCS Gemma4-12B QAT
Q4_K_M with MTP and vision on the RTX 3090, port 7771).
> 2026-08-22: the former `vllmScripts` repository is merged into the
> serverAppConfigs repository. This knowledge base moved from the old repo's
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ graph LR
subgraph Dankserver[AMD Dankserver - Ubuntu 26.04]
A[2x Radeon AI PRO R9700
gfx1201, 32 GiB each]
B2[llama.cpp, layer split
B2[vllm-radiance 0.9.3, TP=2
frank-medium, port 7770]
C[orcarouter Qwen3.8-27B Q8_0 + DFlash2 Q4_K_M
ONE process on both cards, 2x163840 ctx, balanced 32:33]
C[Qwen3.8-27B MXFP4-awq + DFlash2-FP8
ONE process on both cards, 262144 ctx, up to 8 seqs]
A --> B2 --> C
end
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ frank-small, port 7771]
CLI[LLM Clients / API] -->|HTTP :7770| B2
CLI -->|HTTP :7770| E
CLI -->|HTTP :7771| G
```
## Servers
@@ -56,21 +57,25 @@ frank-small, port 7771]
## Active Deployment
- [[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]] — the ACTIVE frank-medium runbook since
2026-09-16 (model swapped 2026-09-19): mainline llama.cpp serving
orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF at Q8_0 with the z-lab DFlash2 Q4_K_M
drafter on Dankserver's 2x Radeon AI PRO R9700, as ONE layer-split process
behind :7770 (tensor parallelism was impossible on the old board's second
card; the 2026-09-20 swap cleared that gate but the runtime still ships
RCCL-less and the collective is unprobed), balanced 32:33 over two 163,840-token
slots
- [[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]] — RETIRED 2026-09-16, one day after it was
deployed: the vllm-radiance MXFP4 stack (stilldeadcode/vllm-radiance:0.9.3 +
- [[frank-medium-radiance-mxfp4]] — the ACTIVE frank-medium runbook since
2026-09-20: vllm-radiance MXFP4 (stilldeadcode/vllm-radiance:0.9.3 +
ggz14/radiance-vllm-mxfp4 patches) serving
just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq as two single-GPU replicas
behind a round-robin proxy; kept as the record of the deployment it
succeeded, plus the PCIe-atomics evidence that ruled out TP=2 on the previous
board — that gate cleared on 2026-09-20, see [[Dual-R9700-Cooperation]]
just1moremodel/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MXFP4-awq with the z-lab DFlash2-FP8
drafter as ONE tensor-parallel process (TP=2) behind :7770 — the three-arm
battery that chose it, the auto-sized 943,581-token KV pool, verified
capabilities (tools, reasoning, vision), and the record of the 2026-09-16
two-replica era
- [[frank-medium-llamacpp-dflash2]] — RETIRED 2026-09-16 → 2026-09-20: mainline
llama.cpp serving orcarouter/Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-GGUF at Q8_0 with the
DFlash2 Q4_K_M drafter as ONE layer-split process (32:33 over two
163,840-token slots); superseded by the radiance TP=2 cutover, and the
rollback target. Keeps the batch/ubatch optimum curve and the per-layer split
arithmetic
- [[Dual-R9700-Cooperation]] — whether the two R9700s can serve ONE model: the
RCCL/PCIe-atomics wall on the old TUF GAMING B650-E, the 2026-09-20 ProArt
B850-Creator x8/x8 swap that cleared it, and the measured three-way verdict
(radiance TP=2 95.8 t/s decode vs layer split 45.7 vs llama tensor mode 30.5)
that put TP=2 in production
- [[frank-medium-rocmfpx]] — PRIOR frank-medium deployment (llama.cpp era,
2026-09-15): charlie12345/ROCmFPX serving
kingjones777/Qwen3.8-27B-ROCmFPX-Q8_0-AGENT-GGUF; kept as the record of the