The note in `references/okf-spec.md` claimed the bundle keeps a "`tags` discipline". It does
not: 22 of 76 concept pages carry `tags`, and neither `kb-lint.sh` nor `kb-coverage.py`
reads that field or `verified` — so the note was a claim about intent that an agent would
believe and pay the wrong cost for (adding tags to a page helps no tool, while `verified`
silently does the real work: it is the date someone last re-checked the page against the
fleet, and its absence means nobody ever has).
The note now states the measured usage instead of the aspiration, records the house link
style (bundle-absolute, 99 links already written that way), and says plainly that Obsidian
`[[wikilinks]]` are not OKF links — with the count this bundle had and the date they were
converted. The spec's own repository is now cited under `# Citations`, which the page was
missing while it lectured others about skipping citations.
Refs #64
Frank
88d486b37b