docs(log): compact changelog to entry law (406 -> 284 lines)
Changelog entries were essay-length incident writeups duplicating the concept pages they created. New entry law recorded at top of log.md: one dated entry = what changed + durable lesson + concept-page link; full narratives recoverable via git log --follow. Every date, headline, incident, and durable lesson preserved; narrative prose that already lives on concept pages (caddy handle-ordering, gluetun/limiter field notes, quadlet gotchas, faillock law, credential-store trap) replaced by pointers. Historical pi-era entries tagged '(pi era)'. Also: self-hosted-web-agents.md '44.5% peer-reviewed CUA' figure could not be re-attributed to any published benchmark via web search today — dropped with an explicit note; the valid core claim (87.4% = managed Cloud, not the self-hostable library) kept. Refs #29
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
a9b3c495da
commit
986081bf1d
2 files changed
+195
-310
No files matched your search
@@ -29,10 +29,17 @@ Key ideas:
|
||||
- Ten watchdogs handle CAPTCHAs, crashes, popups, downloads, and security.
|
||||
- Real browser profiles carry saved logins.
|
||||
|
||||
**On the "87.4 percent" number:** that result refers to Browser Use's managed Cloud agent (the Hybrid type that blends structured browser tools with screenshots). Peer-reviewed results for vision-only (CUA) models are much lower, about 44.5 percent on the same task type. Treat any single accuracy number as one benchmark, not a universal score.
|
||||
**On the "87.4 percent" number:** that result refers to Browser Use's managed
|
||||
Cloud agent (the Hybrid type that blends structured browser tools with
|
||||
screenshots), not the open-source library you self-host. Academic
|
||||
computer-use results on comparable web tasks run far lower, and an earlier
|
||||
"44.5 percent peer-reviewed CUA" figure carried in this page could not be
|
||||
re-attributed to a specific published benchmark (checked 2026-10-19) and was
|
||||
dropped. Treat any single accuracy number as one benchmark, not a universal
|
||||
score.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Local model via llama.cpp (OpenAI-compatible endpoint)
|
||||
# Local model via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
|
||||
from browser_use import Agent
|
||||
from browser_use.llm.openai import ChatOpenAI
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user